Softr + Airtable project — tabbed case detail view + inline editing

I’m the sole user of a case-management app I built for my solo legal expert witness practice: Softr (Basic plan) on top of an Airtable base, currently live at a *.softr.app URL. The home dashboard (dual-pane active case lists, filtering and sorting) is done. What’s left: • Case detail view — clicking a case opens a tabbed page (Overview, Contacts, Billing, Payments, Links, Literature) built from an Item Details block plus Linked List blocks for the Billing and Payments sub-lists. • Inline editing — Case Stage, Next Action, and Next Action Due editable directly from the detail view. Anything involving linked records (attorneys, firms) stays routed to a separate form tool I already use, not built in Softr. • Forms Hub page — buttons linking to five existing intake forms, plus a “Log Time or Charge” shortcut on the case detail view that pre-fills the case via a URL parameter. I’ve attached a build document (schema, known Softr constraints, tab-by-tab breakdown of what the detail view needs to show) that should answer most technical questions up front. One constraint worth flagging before you look: Softr’s January 2026 DSV2 migration removed the ability to filter linked-record dropdowns by an Airtable view, so any linked-record editing needs to stay off this build. One more thing worth flagging: in the attached clickable prototype, every case card on the dashboard opens the same sample detail view (CEG 3138 Padron) — that’s just a demo shortcut on my end, not a signal about how per-case data binding should work in the real build. Based on my own estimate this is 5–8 hours of work. I’m budgeting $325–800, but want your read on whether that’s realistic once you’ve seen the doc. A few questions: 1. Is this a project you can take on, and roughly when could you start and finish? 2. Does a fixed price work for you, or would you rather bill hourly? 3. Anything in the attached doc that looks harder or easier than I’ve estimated? Happy to hop on a short call if that’s easier than email. Thanks for taking a look.