In the big picture, choosing the optimal project management system for your business can positively impact everything from budgeting to company goals. As teams become more complex and more digitally dynamic, it’s essential to select a project management approach that will optimize your team’s performance and align with the goals of your specific project.
Two major project management approaches to consider are top-down and bottom-up, which offer different advantages. This article will serve as an introduction to these two approaches and provide the pros and cons of each to help you decide how to make the most of your project goals.
Top-down approach to project management: Pros and cons
The idea behind a top-down model is to have project tasks delegated from higher-level to lower-level workers. This is done by taking the overarching task goal and breaking it down into fragmented tasks to be completed by separate workers. In a top-down approach, a decision-making project manager typically assigns work to project team members based on metrics that have been determined by higher-ups.
These metrics might include the difficulty or severity of a task or be based on a task’s repetitive nature. A top-down work methodology is the more traditional work model in which senior organizational leaders decide which project team members complete and when that work is due. This design is often referred to as “stepwise” because it allows businesses to examine a larger project aim at a smaller level, contributing to greater insight into best practices for portfolio management.
The following sections highlight a few pros and cons of the top-down approach and illustrate how stepwise refinement could work in various examples. Remember that these examples are not intended to be read as inevitable outcomes. The benefits and disadvantages of any work model are highly contingent on the individual company.
Pros of top-down project management
- Strong strategic oversight: It’s easier to keep an eye on the big picture when only a handful of upper-level team members have had a hand in creating the project. Let’s say you’re running an ad consultancy and have an important client coming down the pike. Having a strong sense of control and unity over the client’s brand identity and goals is simpler when managed by fewer members.
- Clarified responsibilities: Having project functionality hinge on tasks delegated by upper-level workers means every team member is more clear on their role. In the case of the ad consultancy, your graphic designers and logo artists don’t have to waste time trying to gain insight into who should work on what when they have a dependency on higher-level input from the outset.
- Organizational efficiency: Clear timelines directed by upper management streamline your company’s real-time output because they allow all stakeholders to know their roles. In a top-down ad agency, you would always know which team member needs to sign off on a draft and where to ask questions concerning client briefs. This kind of fluidity is invaluable when building an agile workforce.
Cons of top-down project management
- Hierarchical structures: Sometimes, top-down project management can make team members feel trapped in a particular task or underappreciated for their wider contributions. If you’re running a printing company and a team member who’s gifted at font design is always tasked with edits, that lack of flexibility and blockage to advanced project input could eventually grow tiresome.
- Limited creativity: The phrase “variety is the spice of life” is applicable here. Whenever only certain workers contribute to specific project areas, creative limitations can follow. To more effectively work without limits, the inclusion of more team members in the decision-making process can lend itself to a larger pool of ideas from which to deliver projects.
- Reduced feedback from professionals on the ground: What you don’t want from your top-down project management structure is communication flowing only one way. Let’s say you’re leading a team that services phone-based health care professionals but are never on the phone with patients yourself. You need to be able to hear from those health care experts what works and what just looks good on paper.
Bottom-up approach to project management: Pros and cons
The core tenet of a bottom-up approach rests on the idea that lower-level team members should be able to contribute to how tasks are structured to meet project goals. While project timelines and task lists are still generated by leadership in a methodology that uses bottom-up processing, items are not set in stone before lower-level workers have contributed insights into the workflows.
By receiving feedback in the developmental stages of a project, bottom-up forecasting can lend project managers enhanced control. Designing a project strategy on outcomes can reduce surprises down the road and make scheduling much more realistic.
The following sections will provide pros and cons associated with the bottom-up style of work distribution.
Pros of bottom-up project management
- Fostering collaboration: Any project is made better by a greater sense of community completing it. A bottom-up process allows team members to put their heads together and lets everyone feel as though their voice has an audience when it comes to project management.
- Democratic decision-making: A team’s morale is positively impacted by options, flexibility, and varied means for conveying information. The chance to contribute to the strategy, timeline, or delivery for a project is all that many team members need to do their best work. This might mean that the chief communications officer (CCO) for your PR firm sets the goals for this week’s client, and your web specialist has the best idea for parameters next week.
- Responsiveness to emerging challenges: As malleability is one of the most valuable skills a team can have, the ability to recognize and report problems from the ground up is crucial. A bottom-up approach allows team members to communicate areas of improvement more quickly so that one project’s successes or failures inform the next without loss of time.
Cons of bottom-up project management
- Ambiguous decision-making authority: Multiple voices of authority can be confusing. Sometimes, liquidity of power can lead to uncertainty about who’s calling the shots on a particular project. Let’s say you own an expanding e-commerce business with a social media marketing specialist in each state you service. With each social media marketer having equal input into portfolio management, it can be difficult to know who to approach first with questions or concerns.
- Strategic misalignment: With many threads of thought running through a strategizing session, there are bound to be places where ideas don’t line up. Strategic misalignment can occur in a bottom-up approach when all parties are not 100% clear on the order and time frame of company goals.
- Increased risk of serious errors: Creating workflows from the bottom up can raise your team’s chances of missing or misconstruing something vital in the planning stages. If client specifications, deadlines, requirements, and other restrictions are not clearly articulated at the start, unwanted mistakes can take away from the quality of team deliverables.
Find the professionals you need for your project management approach
Figuring out the most advantageous project management strategy for your company takes careful consideration and a bit of trial and error. No one methodology suits every business or project best, and some positives and negatives can shift with the needs of a given client or the capabilities of your team members.
Whether you’re running a startup or developing a digital transformation strategy for a long-established business, consider using Upwork to engage independent professionals who can contribute within teams using top-down or bottom-up project management.
Get This Article as a PDF
For easy printing, reading, and sharing.