I’m looking for a videographer and photographer to document my Ironman race on October 18th, including the race day and possibly the preparation the day before. I’m doing this race as a father, and I want it captured in a way that I can share with my two young boys one day. I’m open to someone who can also help with planning the coverage and capturing both video and stills throughout the event.

About us: Fairway Control is a SaaS platform built for the golf industry. We're onboarding a growing base of customers and need a dedicated support person to be the friendly, competent voice they hear when they need help. The role: This starts as a learning role and grows into a front-line one. Phase 1 — Learn the product (first few weeks): - Work through the app end to end and get genuinely fluent in how it works - Handle Q&A with our team, document what you learn, flag gaps and bugs - Build out and refine our internal help documentation and canned responses Phase 2 — Support our customers (ongoing): - Answer customer questions by email and phone during US business hours - Troubleshoot issues, reproduce problems, and escalate clearly to the dev team - Follow up until issues are actually resolved — no dropped threads - Assist with (and eventually lead) customer onboarding sessions and walkthroughs What we're looking for: - Excellent spoken and written English. You'll be on the phone with US customers, so clear, natural, confident speech is essential. - Availability during US working hours ([9am–5pm Eastern] overlap required). - Reliable high-speed internet, a modern computer, and a quiet workspace with a quality headset — no background noise on calls. - Prior SaaS support, help desk, or customer-facing experience. - Willingness to sign a confidentiality agreement / NDA before receiving access to the app. - Comfortable learning software quickly and explaining it simply to non-technical users. - Organized and self-directed — you keep track of open tickets without being chased. Nice to have: - Familiarity with golf, golf courses, or club operations - Experience with help desk tools (Zendesk, Intercom, HubSpot, Freshdesk, etc.) - Experience writing help docs or knowledge base articles - Comfort doing screen-share demos or training calls How to apply: Please include the following — applications without these will not be reviewed: - Start your proposal with the word "Birdie" so we know you read this. - A short note on your experience supporting a software product — what you supported, and how customers reached you. - Your available hours in US Eastern Time. - A 60–90 second voice or video recording introducing yourself and explaining any software product you know well, as if you were talking to a customer who's never used it. (Loom, Vocaroo, or a plain audio file is fine.) - A quick description of your internet speed, computer, and headset setup.

Seeking an experienced costume designer, preferably with kids’ clothing experience, to design customized costumes and their patterns to be produced for a small-scale production for children’s dress up or Halloween costumes. Expectations and Deliverable: - Collaborate with company on design to meet specifications - Prepare pattern and technical pack for seamstress or factory to produce 3 distinct costumes, based on existing figures - Provide 2 master samples, tech pack and pattern - Discuss production options - Deadline: 30 days

own a multi trade Home Service business,we provide electrical,plumbing and HVAC services to home owners. I am looking for someone to help me put my book together, I have all of the layout and bullet point content with the help of AI, now I need some help with the fluff and bringing that human feel to it. I would like to keep the book to 100 pages or less and also provide a few pages where they could write notes to keep track of thier homes maintenence. For example filter changes, gutter cleaning and other monthly and annual tasks. The book will be a Guide to Saving Money, Protecting Your Home & Living More Comfortably and in a 6 x 9 format.

I am looking for an experienced academic editor and coach to assist me during the first semester of my PhD program in Nursing Education. I am currently working on the early stages of my dissertation, specifically focusing on Chapter 1, the Literature Review, the formal Proposal, and completing multiple Article Critiques. To be clear, I am doing all of my own original writing, synthesis, and research. I need a dedicated professional to provide structural editing, conceptual feedback, accountability, and rigorous compliance checks against academic standards. Scope of Work * Literature Review & Article Critiques: Helping me evaluate, synthesize, and organize high-quality nursing research into a cohesive matrix and narrative. * Chapter 1 Development: Refining the background, problem statement, purpose statement, research questions, and significance of the study. * Proposal Preparation: Ensuring the logic and methodology flow seamlessly from the research questions to prepare me for the proposal defense. * Academic Editing: Checking line-by-line grammar, flow, and strict adherence to [Insert your required style, e.g., APA 7th edition] formatting. Required Qualifications * Degree: Must hold a PhD or EdD (Nursing, Nursing Education, or Higher Education is strongly preferred). * Experience: Proven track record of guiding doctoral students through the dissertation proposal process or serving on dissertation committees. * Skills: Expert knowledge of quantitative, qualitative, or mixed-methods research designs in healthcare/education. Timeline & Budget * Duration: This will be a semester-long project (approximately 3–4 months). * Milestones: We will work in structured phases (e.g., Phase 1: Article Critiques, Phase 2: Chapter 1 Draft, Phase 3: Lit Review, Phase 4: Final Proposal Review). * Budget: Open to hourly or fixed-price milestones based on your experience.

S1000D / NAVAIR IETM Integration Specialist — U.S. Citizens Only ABOUT WMAIR WMAIR LLC is developing an evidence-preserving, multi-format technical-publication viewer and maintenance-information platform. The work supports our response to Navy SBIR , sponsored by the Naval Air Systems Command (NAVAIR). We have a working company-funded prototype that currently demonstrates: - Read-only technical-manual ingestion - PDF text extraction and OCR - Page-level evidence retrieval - Exact source and page citations - Manual-page image presentation - Maintenance-manual, parts-catalog, wiring-diagram, and overhaul-manual search - Role-based technician, QA, parts, and administrator workflows - Source-file hashing and provenance - A separate administrator-only S1000D Issue 6 validation laboratory - API, retrieval, frontend, and regression testing - Safety controls preventing invented procedures, invented part numbers, or return-to-service authorization The existing prototype is research and demonstration software. It has not been approved by the Navy, does not currently claim Navy BREX compliance, and has not been integrated with a designated NAVAIR production environment. We are looking for an experienced S1000D and NAVAIR technical-data specialist who can help us define a credible and technically correct integration path. IMPORTANT: INITIAL ASSIGNMENT ONLY The first contract is a limited, paid technical assessment. The selected consultant will review our existing software, architecture, technical documentation, test evidence, and proposed Navy integration plan. The consultant will then provide recommendations describing what must be changed, added, validated, or documented before the software could be considered ready for integration with a NAVAIR technical-publication environment. The initial assignment does not require the consultant to: - Rewrite the software - Perform full Navy integration - Access a Navy network - Access classified information - Access Controlled Unclassified Information - Convert operational Navy technical manuals - Certify the software for Navy use - Represent that Government acceptance has been achieved - Commit to future work before a Phase II award All initial-review materials will be public, historical, synthetic, or company-generated demonstration data. INITIAL ASSESSMENT OBJECTIVES The consultant will evaluate the prototype’s readiness to support an agnostic technical-publication viewer capable of handling the formats and data structures identified by the Navy. The review should address: 1. S1000D architecture - S1000D Issue 3.0, Issue 4.0, and later-issue considerations - Data modules and Data Module Codes - Publication modules - BREX and project-specific business rules - Applicability structures and cross-reference tables - Common Source Database relationships - Procedural, descriptive, fault, parts, and wiring information - References between modules and external publications - Version-specific schema, DTD, and mapping requirements 2. NAVAIR technical-publication environment - Likely NAVAIR technical-data integration points - NATEC/JEDMICS or other applicable NAVAIR ecosystems - Designated IETM/IETMS viewer requirements when identified by the Government - NAVAIR technical-data governance and acceptance processes - Required interfaces, data packages, manifests, and validation evidence - Areas that cannot be resolved until Government-furnished information becomes available 3. Multi-format viewer requirements The Navy Q&A indicates that the desired solution is an agnostic viewer capable of reading or ingesting multiple technical-publication formats. The consultant should assess our proposed approach for: - S1000D - MIL-STD-3001 XML - PDF and scanned PDF - `.nci` files - OEM or COTS technical-publication formats - Other SGML, XML, raster, or legacy technical-data formats that may reasonably be encountered 4. Graphics and illustrated technical data - Raster and vector graphics - CGM files - Information Control Numbers - Hotspots - Figure and sheet relationships - Illustrated parts breakdowns - Parts-list and figure relationships - Wiring diagrams - Missing-asset detection - Graphic-reference validation - Graphic adjudication and rendering 5. Data rights and markings - Distribution statements - Disposal markings - Rights assertions - DFARS markings - Source-to-output marking preservation - Object-level and package-level provenance - Requirements that should be treated as mandatory acceptance gates - Handling requirements for future ITAR/EAR-controlled or CUI technical data 6. Validation and acceptance - XML, XSD, DTD, and BREX validation - Reference validation - Applicability validation - Graphics and ICN validation - Procedural-order validation - Warning and caution preservation - Defect classification and severity - Error-detection and correction workflow - Human adjudication - Gold-standard datasets - Recommended measures for accuracy, completeness, traceability, and residual error - Evidence needed to distinguish technical feasibility from Navy acceptance 7. Search and information retrieval - Search across heterogeneous technical-publication formats - Task and system identification - Applicability-aware retrieval - Complete-task and complete-page coverage - Typographical-error recovery - Parts, figures, and wiring relationships - Source citations - Retrieval-confidence reporting - Prevention of unsupported or invented maintenance information - Human-review and authorization gates 8. COTS/GOTS and downstream integration - Interface-neutral XML or JSON task packages - Future integration with Government or commercial systems - Ordered procedural steps - Warnings, cautions, and notes - Tools, materials, parts, and figures - Applicability predicates - Media and hotspot references - Offline or disconnected operation - Output suitable for later XR-headset or tablet presentation within an AR environment - Clear separation between data presentation and maintenance authority INITIAL DELIVERABLES The initial contract should produce: 1. Prototype review Review the existing application demonstration, architecture summary, relevant source-code organization, APIs, S1000D laboratory, data model, provenance controls, and test evidence. 2. Written integration-readiness assessment Provide a concise written report identifying: - Capabilities already demonstrated - Technical deficiencies - Unsupported assumptions - Missing S1000D structures - Missing NAVAIR requirements - Viewer and interface gaps - BREX and business-rule gaps - Graphics and reference-handling gaps - Data-rights and cybersecurity concerns - Validation and testing gaps - Items that must remain Government-furnished or TBD 3. Prioritized recommendations Classify recommendations as: - Critical before Phase I submission - Recommended for the Phase I prototype - Required during Phase II - Dependent on Government-furnished information - Dependent on a designated NAVAIR viewer or interface - Future Phase III capability 4. Integration roadmap Provide a practical roadmap showing how the current prototype could evolve toward: - A Navy-aligned agnostic viewer - S1000D and Navy BREX support - MIL-STD-3001 XML support - PDF, `.nci`, and COTS/OEM ingestion - Graphics and ICN rendering - NAVAIR technical-publication integration - Automated validation - Controlled search and retrieval - COTS/GOTS output - AR/XR-ready task-data output 5. Consultation meeting Participate in one remote working session to explain findings, answer questions, and help WMAIR prioritize the next development activities. INITIAL ASSESSMENT HOURS Expected initial effort: approximately 4-9 hours. A proposed allocation is: - Software demonstration and kickoff: 1–2 hours - Architecture and documentation review: 1-2 hours - S1000D/NAVAIR gap analysis: 1-2 hours - Written recommendations: 1–2 hours - Final review meeting: approximately 1 hour Applicants may recommend a different allocation, but this first contract must remain a focused assessment. It is not a complete system-integration engagement. CONDITIONAL PHASE II OPPORTUNITY If WMAIR receives a Navy Phase II award and the consultant’s initial work is successful, WMAIR intends to consider the consultant for a substantially larger follow-on role. No Phase II work, minimum number of hours, or continued engagement is guaranteed. Any follow-on contract will depend on: - WMAIR receiving the applicable Navy award - The Navy’s negotiated Phase II statement of work - Government-furnished technical data and business rules - Export-control and security requirements - Funding availability - Consultant performance and availability - SBIR subcontracting and workshare requirements - Agreement on labor rates and contractual terms ANTICIPATED PHASE II OBJECTIVE The anticipated Phase II objective is to refine, scale, validate, and operationalize the agnostic viewer and related integration services developed during Phase I. The system is expected to support more than one technical-publication platform or product library and to ingest representative Navy technical-publication data provided by the Government. The consultant would serve as WMAIR’s S1000D/NAVAIR technical-data subject-matter expert. The consultant would guide the engineering team, review technical outputs, help establish acceptance criteria, and participate in Navy technical reviews. ANTICIPATED PHASE II WORKSTREAMS 1. Government-furnished-information intake - Review representative Navy S1000D technical publications - Review the applicable Navy or project BREX - Review project business rules - Review applicability cross-reference and condition cross-reference structures - Review distribution, disposal, rights, and DFARS markings - Establish source inventories and controlled-data handling requirements - Identify conflicts between public assumptions and actual Navy data 2. S1000D and standards baseline - Establish the required S1000D issue and schema profiles - Define version-specific handling - Define BREX validation requirements - Define project-specific business-rule handling - Map technical-publication structures to the viewer’s internal data model - Document S1000D, MIL-STD-3001 XML, PDF, `.nci`, and COTS/OEM profiles - Define requirements for backwards compatibility and unresolved content 3. Agnostic viewer architecture and content semantics - Review how the viewer represents documents, modules, tasks, steps, warnings, cautions, notes, tables, figures, parts, and references - Define requirements for source-versus-rendered comparison - Define provenance and revision-control behavior - Review navigation and relationship handling - Define handling of multi-volume publications - Define configuration and effectivity behavior - Support engineering decisions involving format adapters and canonical content objects 4. Applicability, configuration, markings, and rights - Define applicability validation - Review model, serial-number, configuration, and condition logic - Define incompatible-content handling - Define source-marking inheritance - Establish fail-closed rules for unresolved restrictions - Review object-level and package-level rights preservation - Support legal and cybersecurity coordination when required 5. Graphics, ICNs, parts, and technical references - Establish requirements for raster and vector graphics - Define CGM and hotspot support - Review ICN management - Review illustrated parts and figure/list relationships - Review wiring and schematic presentation - Define missing-asset and broken-reference behavior - Support graphics adjudication - Verify that media remains connected to the governing technical content 6. Validation and correction system - Define automated XSD, DTD, and BREX validation - Define structural, semantic, applicability, reference, graphics, and marking checks - Develop defect categories and severity levels - Define fatal-error and warning thresholds - Define correction and revalidation workflow - Establish human-adjudication records - Help create Government-reviewable validation evidence - Support development of the accuracy and residual-error measurement framework 7. Search, retrieval, and task-data output - Define technical requirements for task-level search - Review query-to-source traceability - Define complete-task and complete-evidence requirements - Review configuration-aware retrieval - Define unsupported-answer and insufficient-evidence behavior - Review interface-neutral task packages for COTS/GOTS tools - Define ordered steps, cautions, warnings, media references, and applicability output - Support AR/XR-ready data contracts without treating AR presentation as maintenance authority 8. Navy viewer and system integration - Participate in interface discovery with Navy stakeholders - Review available Interface Control Documents - Help map the WMAIR viewer to authorized NAVAIR technical-data environments - Support NATEC/JEDMICS or other designated-system analysis when applicable - Define import, export, authentication, logging, and audit requirements - Review disconnected or restricted-network requirements - Support integration testing - Document unresolved Government dependencies 9. Technical validation and user evaluation - Help establish representative test libraries - Develop gold-standard evaluation cases - Participate in technical-data-engineer adjudication - Support review by certified instructors and qualified maintainers - Review usability and technical-correctness findings - Support error triage and corrective-action reviews - Participate in test-readiness and demonstration events 10. Documentation, reviews, and transition planning - Participate in technical interchange meetings - Review architecture and validation deliverables - Support monthly or milestone reviews - Review Phase II reports - Help prepare the Phase III transition baseline - Document sustainment, rule-profile, schema, and content-governance requirements - Support training and knowledge transfer ANTICIPATED PHASE II SPECIALIST HOURS Estimated total for this S1000D/NAVAIR specialist: Expected average availability: Approximately 15–25 hours per week, with higher effort during Government-data intake, architecture reviews, validation events, and final demonstrations. These hours are a preliminary planning estimate, not a guaranteed commitment. The final hours will depend on the negotiated Navy statement of work, the number and complexity of product libraries, the Government-furnished formats, the applicable BREX and business rules, the designated integration environment, and the consultant’s final responsibilities. ESTIMATED TOTAL PHASE II TEAM EFFORT The specialist will not be expected to complete Phase II alone. A complete Phase II effort would likely require a multidisciplinary team covering: - Program and technical leadership - S1000D/NAVAIR technical-data engineering - Software and platform engineering - XML and format-adapter development - OCR, NLP, and search engineering - UI and viewer development - Cybersecurity and controlled-data handling - Test automation and independent verification - Aviation maintenance and technical-publication adjudication - DevSecOps and deployment - Quality assurance and documentation Preliminary total WMAIR team estimate: Approximately 18–24-month Phase II program. This is a planning estimate only and will be revised after receiving the Navy’s negotiated requirements, Government-furnished data, applicable business rules, security boundary, and integration specifications. MANDATORY U.S. CITIZENSHIP REQUIREMENT This position is restricted to United States citizens. Applicants must: - Be a current U.S. citizen - Reside in the United States - Be legally authorized to work in the United States - Be eligible to access ITAR/EAR-controlled technical information - Be willing to provide reasonable documentation confirming U.S. citizenship before receiving controlled project material - Disclose any circumstances that could limit access to export-controlled or Government technical information Foreign nationals, non-U.S. citizens, and applicants requiring an export license for access to the anticipated technical information will not be considered for this engagement. Do not submit citizenship documents through an unsecured Upwork message. WMAIR will provide an appropriate verification process if required. REQUIRED PROFESSIONAL EXPERIENCE Applicants should have substantial experience in several of the following areas: - S1000D technical publications - Navy or project BREX - S1000D data modules and publication modules - Common Source Databases - Applicability and configuration management - XML, XSD, DTD, XPath, and structured technical data - IETM or IETMS viewers - NAVAIR technical publications - NATEC or JEDMICS environments - MIL-STD-3001 XML - MIL-DTL-81310 - Legacy PDF or SGML technical-manual conversion - OEM or COTS technical-publication formats - `.nci` technical data - ICNs, CGM graphics, hotspots, and technical illustrations - Illustrated parts catalogs - Wiring diagrams - Rights and distribution markings - DFARS technical-data requirements - ITAR/EAR and CUI technical-data handling - Technical-data validation and acceptance - Navy or Department of Defense software integration - SBIR or STTR technical programs PREFERRED BACKGROUND The strongest applicants will have one or more of the following: - Direct NAVAIR technical-data experience - Prior work supporting Navy aircraft technical publications - Experience developing or validating a Navy BREX - Experience with S1000D Issue 3.0 and Issue 4.0 - Experience integrating an IETM viewer with a Navy environment - Experience supporting NATEC, JEDMICS, NAWC-AD, or related NAVAIR organizations - Experience defining acceptance criteria for technical-publication software - Experience adjudicating procedures, figures, applicability, warnings, cautions, or parts data - Experience translating technical-publication rules into software requirements - Experience working directly with software engineers - Experience participating in Navy technical interchange or program reviews IMPORTANT SKILL EXPECTATION This is not simply a software-development role. The specialist must understand the operational meaning and technical-publication requirements behind the data. The consultant should be able to explain to software engineers: - Which information is authoritative - Which structures are mandatory - Which relationships cannot be lost - Which errors must block acceptance - Which metadata may remain unresolved - How applicability must be interpreted - How graphics and parts references must be preserved - How BREX and project business rules affect validation - What evidence a Navy technical-data reviewer will expect - Which claims WMAIR should not make before Government validation CONFIDENTIALITY AND DATA-HANDLING EXPECTATIONS The initial assessment will use public, historical, synthetic, and company-generated material. The consultant must agree to: - Protect WMAIR proprietary information - Use project information only for the authorized engagement - Avoid uploading project materials to unauthorized external systems - Follow WMAIR access-control and data-retention instructions - Preserve source-document restrictions and markings - Report potential data exposure immediately - Use only approved storage, communication, and collaboration methods - Return or destroy project material when instructed Future controlled-data work will be performed only within an authorized environment and under the applicable contract, security, export-control, and technical-data requirements. ENGAGEMENT STRUCTURE Initial engagement: - Short-term - Remote - Fixed-price or hourly - Approximately 6–12 hours - Focused only on prototype assessment and recommendations Conditional Phase II engagement: - Only if WMAIR receives a Phase II award - Potentially 18–24 months - Primarily, remote. With possible traveling for presentatios for the Navy. - Final schedule and compensation subject to award, negotiation, security requirements, and Government direction HOW TO APPLY Please provide: 1. A concise summary of your S1000D experience. 2. A description of your NAVAIR or Navy technical-publication experience. 3. The S1000D issues and BREX environments you have supported. 4. Examples of IETM, CSDB, XML, graphics, applicability, or validation work. 5. Your experience with NATEC, JEDMICS, NAWC-AD, or other NAVAIR organizations, if applicable. 6. Your availability for the initial 6–12-hour assessment. 7. Your hourly rate or proposed fixed price for the initial assessment. 8. Your anticipated availability for a conditional Phase II engagement. 9. Confirmation that you are a U.S. citizen residing in the United States. 10. Confirmation that you are eligible to work with ITAR/EAR-controlled technical information. 11. Any current or recent security clearance, if applicable. A clearance is not required for the initial public-data assessment. 12. One or two relevant professional references, if available. PLEASE NOTE This posting does not represent a Navy contract award or Government endorsement of WMAIR’s software. The initial contract is solely for an independent technical assessment and recommendations. Any Phase II opportunity is contingent on WMAIR receiving the applicable Navy award and successfully negotiating the follow-on scope.

NOTE 1: US citizens only NOTE 2: This project is in the proposal stage and we hope to get funding starting near the end of the year. We are assembling the technical team for an R&D project involving heterogeneous technical manuals. We seek a senior, part-time technical-publications SME with direct experience in S1000D, MIL-STD-3001 XML, and/or Navy IETM/IETP environments. This is a standards and technical-data architecture role, not a general writing assignment. The proposed system will ingest PDF, S1000D, and MIL-STD-3001; provide page and interactive views; and support source-grounded retrieval while preserving the original technical manual as authoritative. Preferred qualifications: 1. Hands-on S1000D and/or MIL-STD-3001 experience, including applicable issues, releases, or parts. 2. Experience with NAVAIR, NATEC, NAVSEA, another DoD program, an aerospace OEM, or a technical-data tool provider. 3. Familiarity with CSDBs, XML schemas/DTDs, structured-authoring tools, validation workflows, and IETM viewers. 4. Verifiable experience through public work, an authorized redacted sample, a public program reference, detailed resume entries, or a technical reference. Experience with both standards is preferred, but deep experience in one is welcome. Please skip the generic cover letter. Begin your proposal by identifying your S1000D, MIL-STD-3001, and Navy/IETM experience, including versions or parts, your role, most recent year used, and principal tools. Enter "None" where appropriate. Finalists should expect a short technical interview and may be offered a small paid exercise using public data.

This contract covers the formatting, layout, and publishing setup for the AI‑Powered Claims Manual & Workbook. All project terms, specifications, platform requirements, and formatting standards are already provided in the complete package sent to the freelancer. Work will follow the SCHS formatting architecture and the confirmed project terms. Deliverables include: Combined interior file (manual + workbook) Full wraparound cover (front/spine/back) Platform‑ready files for KDP, Gumroad, and Heyzine Total contract: $1,200 Milestones: $600 + $600 All details, instructions, and assets are already provided in the project package.

We are seeking an experienced technical editor to review and refine articles related to building systems and components. Our organization is a trade-focused group that values straightforward, educational content. Responsibilities: Edit articles to ensure clarity, accuracy, and professional tone. Ensure content follows our standard structure: Define the system/components, describe how it works, review common components,List common deficiencies, include inspection scope per ComSOP / inspector takeaways Maintain a consistent, concise, and trade-oriented voice. Suggest improvements for technical accuracy and readability. Requirements: Background in building construction, inspection, or related fields. Proven experience in technical editing or content review. Ability to adhere to a structured format and trade-focused tone. Attention to detail and commitment to factual accuracy. Preferred: Familiarity with trade organizations and technical documentation. Strong grasp of construction terminology and standards. All materials, responses, and work samples must be prepared independently by the applicant. AI-generated or AI-assisted submissions are not permitted. To Apply: Please provide: Your relevant experience in construction or technical editing. Samples of previous technical content you’ve edited. Your availability and estimated turnaround time for a typical article (approx. 1,000–1,500 words). We are looking for someone who can take over editing responsibilities efficiently so we can streamline the process.

We are a growing IT and software services company looking for an experienced and motivated B2B Sales Professional who can help us generate qualified leads and convert them into long-term clients. The ideal candidate has experience selling software development, web development, digital solutions, or IT services to businesses and understands how to identify prospects, reach decision-makers, build relationships, and close deals. Key Responsibilities: Generate qualified B2B leads and new business opportunities Prospect and connect with decision-makers across the U.S. Present our IT/software services to potential clients Schedule qualified sales meetings Follow up with prospects and manage the sales pipeline Negotiate and help close new business Build long-term client relationships We are looking for someone who is results-driven and confident in bringing real business opportunities to the table. This is a freelance opportunity with the potential to develop into a long-term partnership as we grow.