You will get an AI or SaaS decision-readiness diagnostic and evidence map
Project details
Before an AI or SaaS decision becomes a contract, deployment, or board recommendation, someone must be able to reconstruct why it is ready. I turn one defined decision and its sources into a reviewable dossier that distinguishes facts, claims, inferences, assumptions, contradictions, missing proof, gates, conditions, and residual risks.
Designed for founders, executive teams, professional-services firms, and procurement or governance leads reviewing an AI tool, SaaS vendor, pilot, launch, or material change. You receive a bounded analysis — not a generic report or autonomous verdict.
Not included: legal or financial opinion, compliance certification, security audit, penetration testing, source-code review, production implementation, or guarantee of business performance.
Designed for founders, executive teams, professional-services firms, and procurement or governance leads reviewing an AI tool, SaaS vendor, pilot, launch, or material change. You receive a bounded analysis — not a generic report or autonomous verdict.
Not included: legal or financial opinion, compliance certification, security audit, penetration testing, source-code review, production implementation, or guarantee of business performance.
Industry
Financial Services, Government & Public Sector, SoftwareWhat's included
| Service Tiers |
Starter
$375
|
Standard
$750
|
Advanced
$1,250
|
|---|---|---|---|
| Delivery Time | 4 days | 7 days | 10 days |
Live Consultation (Minutes) | 20 | 45 | 60 |
Frequently asked questions
About Lucas
AI Governance Consultant | Risk, Evidence & Decision Analysis
Belo Horizonte, Brazil - 3:37 am local time
I can support:
• AI and SaaS readiness and governance diagnostics
• Business-process and decision-flow mapping
• Evidence, contradiction, gap and risk analysis
• Impact-versus-effort prioritization
• Conditional go/no-go criteria and implementation requirements
• Regulatory and policy research
• Executive reports, technical documentation and decision briefs
My standard entry engagement is a fixed-scope Phase 1 diagnostic. Based on the materials provided, I deliver a findings report, risk and priority matrix, unresolved questions, accountable actions and recommended next steps. Any implementation can then be scoped separately with the appropriate technical professionals.
I hold a PhD and an MA in Philosophy from Université Paris 8 and a Bachelor of Laws. I founded the independent SEVE research program in Paris in 2006 and later created SEVE Gate, its applied decision-structuring method. I am the author of eight published books in Brazil and France, with two additional volumes forthcoming in a collection directed by philosopher Jacques Poulain.
As Superintendent of Public Libraries and the Literary Supplement of Minas Gerais, I worked with collection systems, information workflows, Braille accessibility services and public-facing digital infrastructure. I led the creation of the official websites of the State Public Library and the Literary Supplement and served as General Coordinator, representing the State Secretariat of Culture, of the working group responsible for developing the State Plan for Books, Reading, Literature and Libraries of Minas Gerais. This gave me practical experience translating complex stakeholder needs into public policy, accessible information systems and accountable programs. I also produced and curated Circuito das Letras 2016 and represented the Secretariat at Expo Milano and the Rio 2016 Olympic and Paralympic programs.
Scope boundary: my work covers decision structuring, governance, research and documentation. It is not certification, an independent technical or cybersecurity audit, source-code review or a regulatory guarantee. Legal analysis is limited to the jurisdiction and scope expressly agreed.
Steps for completing your project
After purchasing the project, send requirements so Lucas can start the project.
Delivery time starts when Lucas receives requirements from you.
Lucas works on your project following the steps below.
Revisions may occur after the delivery date.
Scope and source mapping
Confirm the decision, authority, deadline and source boundary; classify facts, statements, inferences, assumptions and missing proof.
Contradiction and readiness
Separate supporting and opposing evidence; identify proof gaps, gates, owners, implementation conditions and residual risks.