You will get AI powered web app, your online presence with generative AI
Project details
Welcome to the future of web applications!
Are you ready to elevate your online presence with cutting-edge AI technology? I specialize in crafting bespoke AI web applications that harness the power of generative AI. From captivating image generation to engaging content creation, my solutions are meticulously tailored to fulfill your unique requirements. With a proven track record of delivering innovative AI projects, I guarantee a seamless journey from conceptualization to deployment.
Highlights:
Transform Your Online Presence with AI Innovation
Personalized Solutions for Your Unique Business Needs
Elevate User Engagement with Dynamic AI Features
Seamless Integration for Effortless User Experience
Future-Proof Your Business with AI-Driven Applications
Service:
Custom AI Web App Development
AI-Powered Image Generation
Dynamic Content Creation
Seamless Integration with Existing Systems
User-Friendly Interface Design
Ongoing Support and Maintenance
Scalable Solutions for Future Growth
Let's collaborate to turn your AI vision into reality!
Are you ready to elevate your online presence with cutting-edge AI technology? I specialize in crafting bespoke AI web applications that harness the power of generative AI. From captivating image generation to engaging content creation, my solutions are meticulously tailored to fulfill your unique requirements. With a proven track record of delivering innovative AI projects, I guarantee a seamless journey from conceptualization to deployment.
Highlights:
Transform Your Online Presence with AI Innovation
Personalized Solutions for Your Unique Business Needs
Elevate User Engagement with Dynamic AI Features
Seamless Integration for Effortless User Experience
Future-Proof Your Business with AI-Driven Applications
Service:
Custom AI Web App Development
AI-Powered Image Generation
Dynamic Content Creation
Seamless Integration with Existing Systems
User-Friendly Interface Design
Ongoing Support and Maintenance
Scalable Solutions for Future Growth
Let's collaborate to turn your AI vision into reality!
AI Algorithms
AdaBoost, AlexNet, Convolutional Neural Network, Feedforward Neural Network, Large Language Model, Multilayer Perceptron, Multimodal Large Language Model, Recurrent Neural Network, Self-Organizing Map, Transformer ModelAI Applications
AI Chatbot, AI Content Creation, AI Text-to-Image, AI Text-to-Speech, AI-Generated Art, AI-Generated Video, Conversational AI, Image Analysis, Image Processing, Image Recognition, Image-to-Image Translation, Text RecognitionAI Development Language
PythonAI Tools
Azure OpenAI, Bing AI, Copy.ai, GitHub Copilot, Jasper AI, NVIDIA AI Platform, PyTorch, Replit, TensorFlow, Word2vecAI Models
ChatGPT, DALL-E, GPT-3, GPT-4, GPT-J, GPT-Neo, Jurassic-2, LaMDA, LLaMA, Naive Bayes Classifier, OpenAI Codex, WhisperWhat's included
| Service Tiers |
Starter
$700
|
Standard
$1,000
|
Advanced
$3,000
|
|---|---|---|---|
| Delivery Time | 3 days | 7 days | 21 days |
Number of Revisions | 1 | 2 | 5 |
AI Model Integration | |||
Batch Normalization | - | - | |
Database Integration | - | ||
Detailed Code Comments | - | - | |
Image Upscaling | - | - | |
MLOps | - | - | |
Model Deployment | - | - | |
Model Documentation | - | - | |
Model Monitoring | - | - | |
Model Testing & Optimization | - | - | |
Model Tuning | - | - | |
Natural Language Processing | - | ||
NLP Tokenization | - | - | |
Pre-Training | - | - | |
Prompt Engineering | - | - | |
Setup File | |||
Source Code |
Frequently asked questions
9 reviews
(8)
(0)
(0)
(0)
(1)
This project doesn't have any reviews.
BW
Brent W.
Mar 24, 2026
Full Stack Developer for SaaS Subscription & Stripe Integration (React + Node.js)
# Upwork Contractor Review
**Rating: 1 Star**
I rarely leave negative reviews, but I have an obligation to the Upwork community to be honest about this engagement. This was, without question, the worst contractor experience I have had on this platform. The failures were not isolated — they were consistent, pervasive, and touched every dimension of the working relationship.
**Communication: Chronic and Costly**
Professional contractors respond within 24 hours. This contractor routinely took 48–72 hours for basic questions — and on multiple occasions went silent for three or more business days without acknowledgment. When responses did arrive, they were vague and often misleading. Phrases like "almost done" and "making good progress" appeared repeatedly, with no specifics. On at least two occasions, I was told a milestone was nearly complete only to discover days later that the work had barely started. There was zero proactive communication — no early warnings about delays, no questions before proceeding incorrectly, no transparency about blockers. I was consistently kept in the dark during a paid engagement.
**Timeline: Far Beyond Any Reasonable Standard**
The contractor proposed the project timeline themselves. They missed the first milestone. Then the second. Then the third. Each missed deadline was followed by a new estimate, which was also missed. Comparable projects of this scope and complexity are delivered in a fraction of the time this contractor consumed. At no point did they proactively acknowledge being behind — deadlines would simply pass in silence until I asked. This is not acceptable. Contractors who miss deadlines have a professional obligation to communicate early and propose solutions. This contractor did neither.
**Quality of Work: Substandard and Unreliable**
The delivered work was riddled with bugs — not subtle edge-case issues, but fundamental, easily reproducible errors that should never survive basic self-review. Core features did not work as specified. The fix cycle was equally frustrating: reported bugs were addressed slowly, incompletely, and often generated new bugs in adjacent areas. Beyond functionality, the code quality itself was poor — poorly structured, inconsistently formatted, and with no adherence to best practices for the technology stack used. This creates real downstream cost for any developer who must maintain or extend the codebase later.
Milestones were repeatedly submitted as "complete" when they clearly were not. I released weekly payments even with substandard work, which extended the engagement further and confirmed a pattern of prematurely claiming completion to trigger payment.
**Documentation: Nonexistent**
Not a single line of verifiable documentation was provided across the entire engagement. No README, no inline comments, no architecture notes, no deployment guidance — nothing. I explicitly requested documentation multiple times. It was acknowledged and never delivered. When I brought in a second developer to assess the codebase, they spent significant time simply deciphering what the code was supposed to do before they could evaluate whether it was doing it correctly. That cost was entirely avoidable.
**Professionalism: Defensive and Declining**
Feedback was met with defensiveness rather than accountability. Bugs were blamed on "edge cases." Delays were blamed on "complexity." Clearly in-scope work was occasionally framed as "additional" — a transparent deflection tactic. At no point did this contractor simply say "I made a mistake, here is how I am fixing it." The attitude also deteriorated over the course of the engagement: early messages were reasonably professional; by the midpoint, responses had become terse, disengaged, and perfunctory.
**Impact**
The financial damage was real — direct payments for work that did not meet specification, plus the cost of remediation by a second developer. Operational disruption was ongoing. Launch windows were missed. Resources were idled. Stakeholder expectations had to be revised repeatedly downward. None of this was unavoidable. It was the direct result of a contractor who failed to meet the basic obligations of a professional services engagement.
**Advice for Future Clients**
If you are considering this contractor, require explicit response-time commitments in writing before starting. Define documentation as a milestone deliverable. Verify all submitted work against your spec before releasing payment. And if you see slow communication in the first week — take it seriously. The patterns that produce failed engagements almost always show up early. They showed up early here.
**Summary**
The work contracted was not delivered. What was delivered was incomplete, buggy, undocumented, and required significant remediation by a second contractor. Timelines were not met — not even close. Communication was chronically inadequate. Accountability was consistently deflective. Beware.
**Rating: 1 Star**
I rarely leave negative reviews, but I have an obligation to the Upwork community to be honest about this engagement. This was, without question, the worst contractor experience I have had on this platform. The failures were not isolated — they were consistent, pervasive, and touched every dimension of the working relationship.
**Communication: Chronic and Costly**
Professional contractors respond within 24 hours. This contractor routinely took 48–72 hours for basic questions — and on multiple occasions went silent for three or more business days without acknowledgment. When responses did arrive, they were vague and often misleading. Phrases like "almost done" and "making good progress" appeared repeatedly, with no specifics. On at least two occasions, I was told a milestone was nearly complete only to discover days later that the work had barely started. There was zero proactive communication — no early warnings about delays, no questions before proceeding incorrectly, no transparency about blockers. I was consistently kept in the dark during a paid engagement.
**Timeline: Far Beyond Any Reasonable Standard**
The contractor proposed the project timeline themselves. They missed the first milestone. Then the second. Then the third. Each missed deadline was followed by a new estimate, which was also missed. Comparable projects of this scope and complexity are delivered in a fraction of the time this contractor consumed. At no point did they proactively acknowledge being behind — deadlines would simply pass in silence until I asked. This is not acceptable. Contractors who miss deadlines have a professional obligation to communicate early and propose solutions. This contractor did neither.
**Quality of Work: Substandard and Unreliable**
The delivered work was riddled with bugs — not subtle edge-case issues, but fundamental, easily reproducible errors that should never survive basic self-review. Core features did not work as specified. The fix cycle was equally frustrating: reported bugs were addressed slowly, incompletely, and often generated new bugs in adjacent areas. Beyond functionality, the code quality itself was poor — poorly structured, inconsistently formatted, and with no adherence to best practices for the technology stack used. This creates real downstream cost for any developer who must maintain or extend the codebase later.
Milestones were repeatedly submitted as "complete" when they clearly were not. I released weekly payments even with substandard work, which extended the engagement further and confirmed a pattern of prematurely claiming completion to trigger payment.
**Documentation: Nonexistent**
Not a single line of verifiable documentation was provided across the entire engagement. No README, no inline comments, no architecture notes, no deployment guidance — nothing. I explicitly requested documentation multiple times. It was acknowledged and never delivered. When I brought in a second developer to assess the codebase, they spent significant time simply deciphering what the code was supposed to do before they could evaluate whether it was doing it correctly. That cost was entirely avoidable.
**Professionalism: Defensive and Declining**
Feedback was met with defensiveness rather than accountability. Bugs were blamed on "edge cases." Delays were blamed on "complexity." Clearly in-scope work was occasionally framed as "additional" — a transparent deflection tactic. At no point did this contractor simply say "I made a mistake, here is how I am fixing it." The attitude also deteriorated over the course of the engagement: early messages were reasonably professional; by the midpoint, responses had become terse, disengaged, and perfunctory.
**Impact**
The financial damage was real — direct payments for work that did not meet specification, plus the cost of remediation by a second developer. Operational disruption was ongoing. Launch windows were missed. Resources were idled. Stakeholder expectations had to be revised repeatedly downward. None of this was unavoidable. It was the direct result of a contractor who failed to meet the basic obligations of a professional services engagement.
**Advice for Future Clients**
If you are considering this contractor, require explicit response-time commitments in writing before starting. Define documentation as a milestone deliverable. Verify all submitted work against your spec before releasing payment. And if you see slow communication in the first week — take it seriously. The patterns that produce failed engagements almost always show up early. They showed up early here.
**Summary**
The work contracted was not delivered. What was delivered was incomplete, buggy, undocumented, and required significant remediation by a second contractor. Timelines were not met — not even close. Communication was chronically inadequate. Accountability was consistently deflective. Beware.
MA
Muhammad A.
Feb 10, 2025
Convert a Simple HTML Page to React Component
Delivered exactly what we needed! A clean, reusable React component with Tailwind. Well-structured code and smooth communication
MA
Muhammad Arslan A.
Feb 10, 2025
Create a Simple MongoDB Aggregation Query
Excellent work! The aggregation query is efficient, well-optimized, and gives us the perfect results. Knows MongoDB inside out!
AL
Austin L.
Feb 10, 2025
Fix Date Formatting Issue in a Node.js API
Fixed our messy date formats in no time! Now, all API responses are consistent. Highly skilled and great to work with.
BS
Babar S.
Feb 10, 2025
Write a Basic Mongoose Query for Filtering Data
Provided an optimized Mongoose query that filters data flawlessly. Super fast response and great code quality.
About Saqib
Sr. Full Stack Developer | MERN Stack | Next.js | React | Node | Apps
64%
Job Success
Lahore, Pakistan - 6:34 am local time
With 10+ years of experience as a Full Stack Developer and AI Developer, I specialize in turning product ideas into fast, secure, and production-ready applications. Whether you need MERN stack development, cross-platform mobile apps, or AI integration, I deliver solutions designed for real users and real business growth.
If you are looking for a MERN stack developer, React developer, Node.js developer, or AI app developer who understands both technology and business goals, I can help.
AI Developer & AI Integration
✓GPT and custom LLM integrations for AI chatbot development
✓ChatGPT and OpenAI API integration
✓RAG pipelines and LangChain workflows
✓AI-powered SaaS applications
✓AI automation and intelligent assistants
✓Recommendation systems and predictive analytics
MERN Stack & Full Stack Development
✓MERN stack development (MongoDB, Express, React, Node.js)
✓MEAN and MEVN stack applications
✓React.js and Next.js frontend development
✓Node.js backend development and API development
✓Real-time web applications (chat apps, dashboards)
✓SaaS application development
Mobile App Development
✓React Native cross-platform mobile apps
✓Flutter mobile app development
✓iOS and Android app development
✓AI-powered mobile features
✓Mobile app performance optimization
APIs, Cloud & DevOps
✓REST API and GraphQL API development
✓Stripe, Twilio, and Firebase integrations
✓AWS and GCP deployment
✓Docker and Kubernetes
✓CI/CD pipelines
✓Microservices and serverless architecture
Security & Performance
✓JWT and OAuth authentication
✓Secure web application practices
✓High-performance optimization
✓Scalable backend architecture
✓Clean and maintainable code
Why Clients Work With Me
✓Clear communication and reliable delivery
✓Strong MERN stack and AI development expertise
✓Scalable architecture focused on long-term growth
✓Business-oriented development approach
✓Ongoing support after delivery
Let’s Build Your Application
Send me a message with your requirements for MERN stack development, AI integration, mobile app development, or full stack development. I will review your project and recommend the best technical approach.
Steps for completing your project
After purchasing the project, send requirements so Saqib can start the project.
Delivery time starts when Saqib receives requirements from you.
Saqib works on your project following the steps below.
Revisions may occur after the delivery date.
send work to client
client will approve