You will get one Supabase RLS, webhook, auth, or Next.js bug diagnosed and fixed

Project details
Send one reproducible Supabase or Next.js bug and an acceptance criterion. I will reproduce the failure, isolate the root cause, deliver the smallest safe patch, add a focused regression check where the codebase supports testing, and return before/after evidence with a concise handoff.
Eligible issues include one RLS or tenant-isolation failure, one auth or role path, one webhook verification/idempotency/retry problem, one Next.js API or deployment failure, or one SQL migration or scheduled-worker failure. Work is staging-first and production mutation is excluded unless separately authorized and funded.
My proof is first-party founder work on Liulum: 103 sequential migrations, 129 RLS-enabled public tables at the inspection point, a restricted application role, signed and idempotent payment-webhook controls, background-worker leases, exact-revision release checks, and 2,355 automated tests across 314 files. These are my own product results, not paid-client outcomes or independent certification.
The $49 project covers one issue, one repository, one environment, and the smallest safe fix. I stop and explain before any rewrite, new feature, unrelated bug, or larger remediation.
Eligible issues include one RLS or tenant-isolation failure, one auth or role path, one webhook verification/idempotency/retry problem, one Next.js API or deployment failure, or one SQL migration or scheduled-worker failure. Work is staging-first and production mutation is excluded unless separately authorized and funded.
My proof is first-party founder work on Liulum: 103 sequential migrations, 129 RLS-enabled public tables at the inspection point, a restricted application role, signed and idempotent payment-webhook controls, background-worker leases, exact-revision release checks, and 2,355 automated tests across 314 files. These are my own product results, not paid-client outcomes or independent certification.
The $49 project covers one issue, one repository, one environment, and the smallest safe fix. I stop and explain before any rewrite, new feature, unrelated bug, or larger remediation.
Programming Languages
JavaScript, TypeScriptCoding Expertise
SecurityWhat's included $49
These options are included with the project scope.
$49
- Delivery Time 2 days
- Number of Revisions 1
- Bug Investigation
- Fix Documentation
- Detailed Code Comments
Frequently asked questions
About Rahul
Supabase & Next.js Launch Hardening | RLS, Webhooks, Release QA
Chandigarh, India - 11:51 pm local time
Good first projects:
- Diagnose and fix one RLS or tenant-isolation problem
- Make one webhook signed, verified, and idempotent
- Trace one auth, API, or deployment bug
- Review one migration or launch blocker
- Add focused regression tests and a plain-language handoff
For a starter engagement, send the affected flow, expected behavior, current error, repository access or a minimal reproducible example, and your deadline. I confirm scope before work, use read-only or staging-first access, and return the root cause, focused fix, verification evidence, and handoff. Small paid diagnostics are welcome.
My proof is first-party product work on Liulum, a multi-tenant TypeScript/Next.js SaaS. Recorded release evidence includes 129 RLS-enabled public tables at the inspection point, a restricted NOSUPERUSER/NOBYPASSRLS application role, rollback-only two-tenant probes, signed and provider-refetched payment-webhook controls, 114 offline money-control assertions, exact-revision web/worker checks, and 2,355 automated tests across 314 files.
These are first-party product results, not paid-client outcomes or independent assurance. This service is not a legal opinion, compliance certification, formal penetration test, or a guarantee that every vulnerability has been found.
Steps for completing your project
After purchasing the project, send requirements so Rahul can start the project.
Delivery time starts when Rahul receives requirements from you.
Rahul works on your project following the steps below.
Revisions may occur after the delivery date.
Scope and reproduce
Verify access, reproduce the reported failure, lock the acceptance criterion, and record exclusions.
Root cause and patch
Isolate the first confirmed root cause and implement the smallest safe fix in the agreed code path.