You will get QA Audit for Web & Mobile Applications
Rising Talent
Project details
I deliver actionable QA audits, not long bug lists. I test like a product owner focusing on real user impact, business risk, and release readiness.
You get transparent communication, fast turnaround, and professional reporting—so you know exactly where your product stands and how to improve it quickly.
You get transparent communication, fast turnaround, and professional reporting—so you know exactly where your product stands and how to improve it quickly.
Testing Platform
Website Testing, Mobile Testing, Software TestingDevice
PC, Mac, Linux, iPhone, iPad, Android Mobile Phone, Android Tablet, Windows TabletLanguage
EnglishWhat's included
| Service Tiers |
Starter
$50
|
Standard
$75
|
Advanced
$150
|
|---|---|---|---|
| Delivery Time | 2 days | 10 days | 15 days |
Number of Revisions | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Test Scenario | - | - | |
Summary Report | - | ||
Annotated Screenshots | - | ||
Test Desktop | |||
Test Mobile |
Optional add-ons
You can add these on the next page.
Fast Delivery
+$25 - $50
Automation Initiatives
(+ 5 Days)
+$50
Test Cases
(+ 5 Days)
+$25
Documentation
(+ 5 Days)
+$50
1 review
(1)
(0)
(0)
(0)
(0)
This project doesn't have any reviews.
RB
Rahul B.
May 21, 2026
Automated Testing Framework Developer - Playwright for Angular SaaS Platform
We recently engaged Adler QA for end-to-end quality assurance testing of our product — ConnectQuickly — and the experience was genuinely impressive.
Puneet led the engagement with a level of ownership that you don't often see in a QA partnership. From the very start, he took time to understand the product deeply — not just the features, but the actual user flows, edge cases, and the intent behind each module. That context-awareness showed in the quality of bugs he and his team surfaced.
The testing was thorough and well-structured. The team covered functional flows, boundary conditions, and scenarios that even we hadn't fully mapped out internally. Bug reports were detailed, reproducible, and prioritized sensibly — which made our developer turnaround much faster. No vague descriptions, no missing steps — just clean, actionable findings.
What stood out most was the communication. Puneet was responsive, proactive, and kept the feedback loop tight throughout the engagement. Whenever something was unclear, he'd reach out rather than make assumptions — and that saved us a lot of back-and-forth.
The team's collaborative attitude made the whole process smooth. They worked with us, not just for us.
Overall, Adler QA — and Puneet in particular — delivered exactly what a growing product team needs: rigorous testing done with professionalism and genuine care for quality. We'd highly recommend them and look forward to working together again.
Puneet led the engagement with a level of ownership that you don't often see in a QA partnership. From the very start, he took time to understand the product deeply — not just the features, but the actual user flows, edge cases, and the intent behind each module. That context-awareness showed in the quality of bugs he and his team surfaced.
The testing was thorough and well-structured. The team covered functional flows, boundary conditions, and scenarios that even we hadn't fully mapped out internally. Bug reports were detailed, reproducible, and prioritized sensibly — which made our developer turnaround much faster. No vague descriptions, no missing steps — just clean, actionable findings.
What stood out most was the communication. Puneet was responsive, proactive, and kept the feedback loop tight throughout the engagement. Whenever something was unclear, he'd reach out rather than make assumptions — and that saved us a lot of back-and-forth.
The team's collaborative attitude made the whole process smooth. They worked with us, not just for us.
Overall, Adler QA — and Puneet in particular — delivered exactly what a growing product team needs: rigorous testing done with professionalism and genuine care for quality. We'd highly recommend them and look forward to working together again.
About Puneet
Senior QA Automation Engineer | Playwright | Cypress | Selenium | API
Indore, India - 6:34 am local time
I have 10+ years of experience in software testing and QA automation, helping SaaS, FinTech, Healthcare, and E-Commerce companies improve product quality and accelerate releases.
I specialize in designing and implementing scalable automation frameworks that are easy to maintain and deliver long-term value.
What I can help you with:
âś” Playwright Test Automation
âś” Cypress Test Automation
âś” Selenium WebDriver Automation
âś” API Testing (REST & GraphQL)
âś” End-to-End Testing
âś” Regression Testing
âś” Cross-Browser Testing
âś” Mobile Testing with Appium
âś” Performance Testing (JMeter, K6)
âś” CI/CD Integration (GitHub Actions, Jenkins, Azure DevOps)
Services:
• Build automation frameworks from scratch
• Automate manual test cases
• Stabilize flaky test suites
• API automation and validation
• Test strategy and QA process improvement
• Release and regression testing
• Performance and load testing
• Continuous testing in CI/CD pipelines
Why clients work with me:
âś“ 10+ years of QA Automation experience
âś“ Fast communication and quick turnaround
âś“ Clean, maintainable automation frameworks
âś“ Strong attention to detail
âś“ Focus on business outcomes, not just test execution
âś“ Reliable delivery and long-term support
Tools & Technologies:
Playwright, Cypress, Selenium, Appium, Postman, TypeScript, JavaScript, REST API, GraphQL, Jenkins, GitHub Actions, Azure DevOps, JMeter, K6, BrowserStack, SQL, MongoDB, AWS
Whether you need a Playwright expert, API automation specialist, or a dedicated QA Automation Engineer to strengthen your release process, I can help.
Send me a message to discuss your project requirements.
Steps for completing your project
After purchasing the project, send requirements so Puneet can start the project.
Delivery time starts when Puneet receives requirements from you.
Puneet works on your project following the steps below.
Revisions may occur after the delivery date.
Any compliance needs to be followed ?
What's the targeted user count when product goes to live ?
This helps in identifying the performance bottlenecks