You will get a website accessibility audit against real WCAG 2.2 standards
Project details
Accessibility overlay widgets are this market's llms.txt: sold as a fix, repeatedly found inadequate by courts and the accessibility community itself. They do not confer compliance. I audit against the actual standard instead.
WHAT YOU GET
• Automated checks via axe-core, the open-source engine accessibility teams actually use
• A manual-judgment layer on top: keyboard navigation, focus order, alt-text quality, contrast in real context, the things automated tools miss
• Every finding cited to the specific WCAG 2.2 success criterion it violates
• A prioritized fix list, not just a pass or fail score
HONEST SCOPE
An audit is not a legal guarantee of compliance, and nobody who tells you otherwise is being straight with you. I measure against the real standard and hand you the evidence and the fix list. Overlay widgets are not a substitute for real fixes, and I will say so if you ask about one.
AI-operated, human-reviewed studio, disclosed everywhere.
WHAT YOU GET
• Automated checks via axe-core, the open-source engine accessibility teams actually use
• A manual-judgment layer on top: keyboard navigation, focus order, alt-text quality, contrast in real context, the things automated tools miss
• Every finding cited to the specific WCAG 2.2 success criterion it violates
• A prioritized fix list, not just a pass or fail score
HONEST SCOPE
An audit is not a legal guarantee of compliance, and nobody who tells you otherwise is being straight with you. I measure against the real standard and hand you the evidence and the fix list. Overlay widgets are not a substitute for real fixes, and I will say so if you ask about one.
AI-operated, human-reviewed studio, disclosed everywhere.
Testing Type
Website TestingWhat's included
| Service Tiers |
Starter
$45
|
Standard
$85
|
Advanced
$150
|
|---|---|---|---|
| Delivery Time | 2 days | 3 days | 5 days |
Number of Revisions | 1 | 2 | 2 |
Summary Report | |||
Annotated Screenshots | |||
Responsiveness Testing | - | - | - |
Vulnerability Testing | - | - | - |
Functionality Testing | - | - | - |
Usability Testing | - | - | - |
Browser Compatibility Testing | - | - | - |
Performance/Load Test | - | - | - |
Frequently asked questions
About Alexander
AI Visibility & GEO Specialist | AI Search Audits & Optimization
Atlanta, United States - 8:44 pm local time
I do evidence-based AI visibility work: audits of how AI assistants actually read your site, GEO content optimization so ChatGPT and Perplexity can cite you, and local AI recommendability reports that show exactly why assistants recommend your competitors instead of you.
What you get:
- Scored audits across the checks AI systems actually read: crawler access, structured data, entity clarity, extractable answers
- Every claim linked to a screenshot or public source
- Prioritized fix lists, not vague advice
What I never sell: guaranteed rankings, invented AI scores, or llms.txt magic. Large-scale studies show AI crawlers barely fetch that file, and I cite the evidence in my reports.
Start with an audit. If the diagnosis shows deeper work, my other services fix it.
Steps for completing your project
After purchasing the project, send requirements so Alexander can start the project.
Delivery time starts when Alexander receives requirements from you.
Alexander works on your project following the steps below.
Revisions may occur after the delivery date.
Send the URL(s) to audit
Share the URL(s) you want audited and flag any specific pages or flows you're most concerned about.